Showing posts with label AOL. Show all posts
Showing posts with label AOL. Show all posts

Saturday, December 4, 2010

4 Companies Making A Difference In Your Quest For Engagement

Teaser: One thing that's apparent in the rush toward engagement -- there is no one way to drive it. But here are just a few of the solutions that can help you sustain the vital marketing relationship.

Highlights:

  • Solve Media's Type-In replaces captchas with relevant brand messages
  • EXPO TV leverages consumer insight to create a video community that advice seekers and brands can join
  • AOL's Project Devil enables consumers to explore brand messages and information on their terms in a low-distraction environment
  • The Meebo Bar gives publishers an easy way to make their content social and drive incremental viral traffic


  • Gigabytes of speeches, articles, and blog posts have pointed to the need to drive deeper engagement with consumers. It's a topic that goes right to the heart of digital media's advantages -- two way communications and the opportunity to deliver bona fide experiences. But in all of this discussion, the definition of engagement quickly gets squishy.
    • Is a click engagement?
    • How about a "like"?
    • Is there a minimum time threshold required to qualify as an engagement?
    • Do we need engagement standards across the industry?

    One thing that's apparent in this rush toward engagement -- there is no one way to drive it. Both new and established companies are taking different approaches to the goal. Today I want to discuss four companies with that are making distinctive in-roads toward helping marketers forge deeper connections with audiences. Each company's product is designed to create ongoing brand impact -- a rich real-world experience, or greater message recall, or delivery of deep and compelling information to drive brand choice.

    Solve Media: Engagement inspired by your third grade teacher

    What do you do if you want to make sure you don't forget something? Solve Media hopes we remember the advice of our third grade teachers (in my case Mrs. Briggs): You write it down, or type it into something. Solve Media (disclosure, a Catalyst S+F client) was founded to leverage that idea for marketers.

    The core offering is the Type-In -- a unit that replaces the frustrating "captchas" that confront us when we want to register or gain access to content. Every day, almost 300 million of these exasperating captchas get filled out; many more than once because they can be so difficult to decipher. Enter Solve Media.



    See the ad, type in the message, and you're done. Here's a short vid that makes it all clear.





    "Type-Ins are dead simple," says Ari Jacoby, co-founder and CEO of Solve Media. "Lots of companies are focusing on layers of technology and data sets to coax higher response rates. All of that is important work. But we took a different road. Our platform offers a genuine and guaranteed value exchange, without new infrastructure or privacy issues for clients. The consumer gets what she wants, and the client and publisher get real value."



    Does it work? Solve commissioned a third-party Wharton School of Business study that showed a 111 percent higher level of brand recall from Type-Ins versus banners, and 12 times the level of message recall. Further, it appears that people are at least as likely to complete a Type-In versus a captcha in order to get what they seek. Internal Solve Media data indicate that 40 percent of consumers who encounter a Type-In engage and type the information correctly.

    Mrs. Briggs from third grade was right.

    Type-ins are sold by pay-per-completed-type-in. You only pay for those instances when consumers type the message correctly. Many large publishers are implementing this new platform because it creates new inventory, reduces customer frustration, and gives advertisers impact. Some pubs are also exploring the platform as an alternative method of paying for content. For example, a major metro newspaper could deploy a Type-In instead of charging a monthly fee for content. Since so few consumers are willing to pay cash for content, this technology offers a way to get consumers to pay attention and for publishers to monetize their product.

    Solve is newer than the other companies discussed in this piece, but they have already garnered an impressive client list, including Toyota, Microsoft, Expedia, Universal, and Dr. Pepper.

    EXPO TV: Engagement through personal endorsement

    We've all seen the data that consumers trust the recommendation of a regular person -- any regular person -- more than ads. More and more consumers are turning to the web to find consumer POVs before they buy. EXPO TV http://www.expotv.com/, a New York based start-up, is leveraging this consumer insight to create a video community that advice seekers and brands can join. In just a couple years, they've cultivated a remarkable client list.

    Endorsements online aren't new. But EXPO TV has created a community of product fans and reviewers who volunteer to deliver their thoughts in stand-up-presenter videos. Consumers appear onscreen to discuss the merits (and issues) of products.

    Here's an example:


    See all Personal Care & Hygiene reviews at Expotv.com


    This video and several others were tested in a comScore study measuring the effectiveness of consumer word of mouth videos versus commercials. The study found that these homemade creations, despite their decidedly unslick production values, have comparable persuasive power to professional ads.
    It's easy to see why so many consumers find this sort of video compelling. So compelling, in fact, that some progressive brands, like Gain do, have made these the centerpiece of their brand web presences.



    Consumers can rate any product that they like, but brands can encourage consumers to rate their offerings in a variety of ways. You can sponsor a contest, use their Tryology program to send out samples in exchange for honest reviews, even build dedicated brand pages on the site. Additionally, EXPO can distribute videos directly to retailers, who use them as an aid to sale, as in this example from Amazon. By partnering with EXPO, you get rights to use consumer videos whenever and wherever.
    All videos are transcribed and matched to products, right down to the SKU. One result is that when you look up consumer products in Search, EXPO videos are often among the top 10 results.

    EXPOTV lets consumers speak freely. They ask consumers for honest opinions. Fans praise freely. And consumers that have questions or issues are welcome to respond and add videos to the EXPOTV site as well. But what's interesting is that the tenor of video is almost universally positive -- 85 percent.

    EXPO TV has more than 75,000 regular video-making participants, and its vids have garnered more than 40 million views since the platform was launched.

    AOL Project Devil

    A major new engagement initiative from AOL, called Project Devil http://advertising.aol.com/creative/projectdevil, has just been launched with a premier list of charter advertisers including General Mills, Unilever, Lexus, Sprint, and Procter & Gamble.

    This new creative execution enhances consumers' experiences as they interact with content, and drives significantly greater engagement. Devil does this by enabling the consumer to explore brand messages and information on their terms in a low-distraction environment.

    Devil ads are larger units, 400x1200 compared to the standard 300x250 units. That gives brands a 100 percent voice on the page and offers a multitude of content in a single, unbroken space. The modular unit enables the brand to insert virtually any form of content into one of the template unit zones.

    These zones can include video, interactivities, choosers, store finders, deep product information, and the like. In essence, they treat the product and the process of learning more about it as "news". Here's an explanatory video:



    The Devil offering also makes significant changes to the overall page experience. Rather than competing for attention with a bunch of sponsored messages, Devil ads are the only paid marketing offered on those pages.

    To really see the experience, you need to look at a Devil ad in the context of a web page on which it appears. This view gives you a sense of what they are going for -- genuine content integration rather than garish, blinky "click now" annoyances at the periphery of the screen.

    According to AOL, Devil is a paradigm shift for digital advertising, where ads have historically been designed to distract users from the content they sought. Their website puts it this way:

    Most online ads today are designed to distract the user. So as ads have proliferated, the user experience has suffered -- along with the user, of course. In many other media, ads are part of the experience. Far from detracting from the writing or programming, they contribute to it. Nowhere is this more possible than on the internet. Project Devil is our first step toward realizing this potential.
    A nice vision and a cool unit.

    Meebo: Connecting brands to my social graph

    Given Meebo's http://www.meebo.com/ heritage of making social sharing easier, it's only natural that their solutions for brands focus there as well. Last year the company launched the Meebo Bar http://www.meebo.com/websites/. It gave publishers an easy way to make their content social and through that functionality drive incremental viral traffic.

    Meebo users that arrive on the participating sites automatically see the toolbar at the bottom of their browser, in front of a small strip over the site content. As the user scrolls down, the bar is persistent, moving with the user's field of vision. It's polite yet intrusive -- let's call it "poltrusive."

    The toolbar offers brands several ways to communicate with consumers, drive engagements, and spread messages virally. Here's a picture of the "unopened" toolbar, which features what they call a "media alert."



    The user hovers over or clicks on the alert, which opens a large 900x400 window. What appears in the window is up to the marketer -- video, Flash, static images, interactivities, advergames, store finders -- virtually anything a brand might find useful.

    Engagement times average 30-50 seconds. Advertisers only pay for engagements, not impressions; the settings on the bar are such that accidental rollovers are not counted.

    Consumers can also drag and drop marketing messages into their social media platforms -- Facebook, Twitter, AIM, email, and more. The sharing feature encourages both longer and stronger interaction by the user, as well as free distribution of brand messages across users' social graphs. A recent program for Hershey's Kisses invited users to customize the wrapper on a virtual kiss and send it to friends and family through their favorite social channels. It gave Hershey a presence on lots of social networks through a single buy on their platform.



    Of course, consumers' willingness to take a message viral depends upon the creative, and Meebo offers advice to marketers on how to make messages more viral. Additionally, because the platform is a permanent part of participating sites, it affords the opportunity for dayparting. Said Carter Brokaw, CRO of Meebo:
    "One way in which we differ in the marketplace is that because we have a platform that is persistent on websites, we can serve impressions based on time, and that drives engagement."

    Targeting naturally improves response rates. Marketers can choose demographic as well as psychographic and interest based targeting, or a combination of these techniques.

    Conclusion

    I like what these four companies are doing because their approaches start with a consumer insight and use it to create something unique.

    For Solve, that insight relates to how human memory works. With EXPO TV it's our innate desire to understand what others think. AOL's Devil uses size, functionality, and low distraction to break through our distraction filters, while Meebo leverages our desire to interact with friends to drive advertiser value.

    Leveraging consumer insight is surely essential to driving sustained engagement, and it's great that these and other companies are taking such distinct approaches to realize the same goal.

    Tuesday, January 27, 2009

    Tuesday, January 13, 2009

    The New Bebo: AOL's Integrated Social Powerplay?

    Last month Bebo delivered a major redesign that integrates a lot of AOL's enduring popular features and begins to offer the short of multiplatform ecosystem that may alter the social realm in AOL's direction.

    As Mashable reported about a month ago, Bebo's new features include:

    IM/AIM integration: Log in or keep track of your friends right from BEBO
    Social: Integration of AOL's recently required SocialThing, a service similar to FriendFeed. This enables you to feature content from other social presences on your pages, even track nonBebo friends.
    Email: Get notifications of new messages in AOL mail, Yahoo Mail, GMail, and (soon) Outlook.
    Access to TW Audio/Video: Bebo now has Time Warner multimedia built right in, to significantly enhance the entertainment value of the experience.


    This screenshot I took off Mashable gives you a sense of all of this integration, as well as the enduring attractiveness of Bebo.



    I like Bebo as a service, though more Americans will need to be in its clutches before it could replace FaceBook for me. In addition to offering a beautiful and highly functional and entertaining environment, the service also has some amazing and pleasantly intrusive ways for marketers to reach this audience. Perhaps all this great integration will mean a boost to Bebo traffic.

    Thanks for reading, and don't forget to write.

    Monday, December 8, 2008

    iMedia Summit: AOL Platform A



    AOL Platform A gave a comprehensive presentation on the many opportunities and developments as this company makes strides in providing that “Everything you want, in one place” solution that truly defines the vision behind the company. My key takeaway from the presentation is the strength of their many online site brands – they really do offer leadership presences in many of the key verticals that consumers are interested in today.

    As they constantly add new properties to their quiver of assets, they also offer the cutting edge targeting and other technologies that can make a difference – and indeed are making a difference – for so many brands today. Also, lemme give you a reminder that AOL Platform A is one of the biggest sponsors of iMedia, event after event, year after year. So special props for that, folks!

    Thanks for reading, and don't forget to write.

    Monday, August 4, 2008

    AOL: It's a SocialThing

    As AOL struggles to evolve, and by struggle I mean pursuing a veriety of paths as are many media companies, their initiatives in LifeStreaming are pretty interesting. If you are an AIM user you may have read or tried their BuddyUpdate offerings, which allow users to track other people across a variety of social media platforms like Twitter.

    Now they have purchased SocialThing, a product in private beta that promises to add a host of additional life streaming capabilities to the AOL operation. The Boulder CO operation is one of the ten companies in the TechStars incubator initiaitve, which provides dinero and counsel to ideas that hold a great deal of promise.

    Here's a promo vid for TechStars.



    It got me to thinking about my biggest pet peeve of social media -- that I do not have time to keep up with the goings on at a dozen different social communities, but I am driven to join them because each offers tailored functionality to foster a specific kind or set of kinds of interaction.

    SocialThing appears to be similar to FriendFeed, though doubtless there are differences I don't understand. But check them out, and bravo to AOL for pursuing this direction which from my view appears to be a winner.

    Monday, March 24, 2008

    $850MM for Bebo???

    So we all saw the news a week ago. AOL decided to buy social networking site Bebo for $850MM. But for most US marketers, Bebo is in the mental category of the decidedly second tier. $850MM is a lot of green for second tier.

    Let’s take a look at the whys of this purchase.

    Start with AOL. Remember AOL? They probably got you online. They told you “You’ve Got Mail!” and you loved hearing it, until vIaGrA aS lOw aS $3 a pIlL started filling your box. There was that several month period when you couldn’t get on to save your life because they over grew. There were the ubiquitous CDs in the mail. There were the people that found something to do with those CDs. And there was the it's impossible to cancel cancellation process.

    AOLwas the walled garden that got such a giant share of marketing dollars in the 90s that some companies didn’t buy anything else. They made companies sign multiyear multimillion dollar deals. Because they could. You would have too.

    Time Warner paid more for AOL in the 1990s than all of the African economies put together. Wait, that may not be true. But you get the picture.

    But then things began to change. Like all of the dial-up based companies, they had a great deal of difficulty switching to broadband. It was a math problem. Dial-up service was, for an ISP, more or less pure profit. The consumer paid the phone bill, the ISP provided some numbers to get online, and pretty much pocketed the rest. $23.95 a month times 30 million members times 12 = $8.622Billion. Not bad.

    Now AOL had horrendous churn, as did most of the dial up services. I think the number was 6 to 9% PER MONTH. Hence the CDs in the mail. It takes a lot of effort to replace hundreds of thousands of members a month. But then, AOL was making more money as well, because they had so many sponsors and were able to force marketing activities onto members at will.

    My Machiavellian side had a favorite such app, the “welcome screen” that popped up a direct response offer that you had to read and close before doing anything else. I worked for a software company at the time, and we bought it three times, and sold over 130,000 $40 software packages. It was TV style marketing in the digital era. Forced viewing. Of course as a consumer it was exasperating. But there you go.

    And it doesn’t get any more euphemistic than calling a billboard ad a welcome screen.

    Broadband is decidedly NOT as profitable for the old order ISPs. That’s because the connection is provided via DSL or cable, and the companies that operate those services aren’t dumb. They get your $30 or $40 or in some parts of the country $60 a month, and pocket the lion’s share. The old order ISPs had and in some cases still have partnerships with the ISPs, but the rev share is lopsided against them. And who can blame Comcast or ATT for recognizing the value of what they've got?

    AOL tried offering a content-centric broadband service – it was something like $10 a month, and offered exclusive content and the like. It wasn't a connection charge. It was a content charge. It didn’t set the World on fire by AOL’s historical standards – I suspect that for most people $60 a month is quite enough to be shelling out for Internet. But any initiaitive on the scale of an AOL offering is big by the standards of most companies.

    More recently AOL divided itself in two. They have a connectivity side and an advertising side. AOL now operates a free portal at AOL.com and offers free email and other services, including the IM that you probably use. Advertising is very lucrative of course.

    Their connectivity side still offers users access, but now to its free portal as opposed to the walled garden. The ad side sells the ads on AOL.com as well as other sites like its TMZ subsidiary and MapQuest.

    AOL.com is worth a visit if you haven't been lately. Look familiar? Yep. You could swap the AOL at the top with Yahoo and not notice a difference. But My.AOL.com is pretty nice. Have a look by registering. You can do it with an existing non AOL mailing address. And AOL search might as well have a rip mark from where the company took the Google logo off and swapped it for the running man.

    You can see the company struggling – they are part of Time Warner and thus need to generate big dollars and share. Time Warner doesn’t play fourth place well. They don’t like it a bit.

    So now they are entering the social media space in a big way with the purchase of Bebo. ACTUALLY, THAT'S NOT TRUE. AOL actually pioneered social media. Practically invented it. It's just that they lost that lead, like their lead in so many other areas, over the past few years.

    You probably first chatted in an AOL chatroom. Most people did.

    BTW, Bebo is NOT a second tier site. At least not everywhere. 40% of its users come from the UK, where it is the king of the space. And Ireland, with about 3.5 Million inhabitants, has almost as many members as the US, which has roughly 300 million inhabitants. Bebo is also strong in Australia and New Zealand, and even launched a Polish version which is doing rather well.

    Clearly this is a global play. According to Alexa, Bebo is the number 5 site in Ireland, number 7 in the New Zealand, number 10 in the UK, and number 14 in Australia. And if your curious, number 160 in the US.

    So Bebo must be pretty good.

    And it is. I like it. It offers a more freedom aesthetically than Facebook, and a lot more apps and such than MySpace. A series of compelling channels easily port video and other conent to your page. And here’s the rub: they do it effortlessly. I have no doubt that you can do all this on FaceBook, but it isn’t this simple.

    Skins let you decorate your page but avoid the garish ugliness of your typical user created MySpace pages. Blogging facility is yummy.

    In short, the user experience is quite good. For an American like me, it just needs more activity. What’s most interesting to me about this social space is how leaders can be also rans in months, and second tier can become dominant is just as little time.

    I suggest you watch this user created video about Bebo, made by a member in Ireland. If for no other reason than to see how passionate the users are.


    Watch More Videos Uploaded by bebo.com/jane.white8

    Will it be a good investment? I dunno. I have no difficulty looking at the fundamentals of a brick and mortar business and making a decent prediction. But in a market as fickle as social media, it’s hard to say. What is plain is that AOL needs to do something big to get back in the big leagues of social. And paying $850MM for Bebo is certainly a big initiative.

    There is a slash and burn article about AOL in April's Fast Company. Which makes me bullish about AOL and its abiity to reinvent itself and be a leader again. Why? Because the CW in digital is almost always extreme. And completely incorrect 50% of the time.

    Bebo is indeed a big initiative. So were the acquisitions of Advertising.com and Tacoda. The company is clearly in the process of reinvesting itself. This is going to be a very interesting process to watch.

    Thanks for reading, and don’t forget to write.